ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN CONSTRUCTION THROUGH ARBITRATION (BADAPSKI: INDONESIAN CONSTRUCTION ARBITRATION AND ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION BOARD) IN THE PROJECT OF PLTU 3 BANGKA BELITUNG (2X30 MW)

Abstrak

Construction project The Steam Power Plant (PLTU) 3 Bangka Belitung (2x30 MW) is facing various technical and administrative challenges that have led to disputes between the project owner and the contractor. Dispute resolution in construction projects becomes crucial to maintain project continuity and prevent delays that could potentially harm various parties. BADAPSKI (Indonesian Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution Board for Construction) as a specialized arbitration institution in the construction sector offers quick, efficient, and industry-specific dispute resolution solutions. This article discusses the background of the dispute in the PLTU 3 Bangka Belitung project, the resolution mechanism through BADAPSKI, and the advantages of arbitration as an alternative compared to litigation. Through a qualitative descriptive method, this research analyzes the arbitration process conducted, the obstacles faced, and the final outcome of the dispute resolution. The discussion results show that arbitration through BADAPSKI not only accelerates the resolution process but also maintains professional relationships between the disputing parties. This conclusion emphasizes the importance of BADAPSKI's role in supporting dispute resolution in Indonesia's construction sector, particularly in large-scale projects such as coal-fired power plants (PLTU).