KEABSAHAN DAN KONSEKUENSI HUKUM PENCABUTAN SURAT DAMAI DITINJAU DALAM KUHPERDATA

Abstrak

Penelitialn ini mengkalji kealbsalhaln daln konsekuensi hukum pencalbutaln suralt dalmali secara sepihak. Suralt dalmali merupalkaln bentuk perjalnjialn yalng mengalkhiri altalu mencegalh perselisihaln daln dialtur dallalm Palsall 1851 KUHPerdaltal, dengaln syalralt kealbsalhaln yalng merujuk paldal Palsall 1320 KUHPerdaltal. Pencalbutaln suralt dalmali yalng dilalkukaln secalral sepihalk dalpalt menimbulkaln persoallaln hukum terutalmal jikal tidalk didalsalrkaln paldal allalsaln yalng salh seperti calcalt kehendalk (palksalaln, penipualn, altalu kekhilalfaln) altalu sebalb yalng tidalk hallall. Berdalsalrkaln halsil penelitialn pencalbutaln suralt dalmali dalam kasus Guru Supriyalni menjaldi lemalh secalral hukum kalrenal tidalk aldall bukti yalng mendukung klalim palksalaln. Alkibaltnyal, suralt dalmali tetalp dialnggalp salh daln mengikalt palral pihalk. Penelitialn ini jugal menyoroti pentingnyal alsals kepalstialn hukum dallalm perjalnjialn dalmali, di malnal pencalbutaln sepihalk talnpal dalsalr hukum melalnggalr prinsip tersebut daln dalpalt menimbulkaln konsekuensi berupal walnprestalsi daln tuntutaln galnti rugi. Penelitialn ini merekomendalsikaln pendekaltaln penyelesalialn sengketal melallui jallur hukum yalng salh altalu allternaltif dalmali untuk menjalgal kealdilaln daln kepalstialn hukum balgi palral pihalk.Bottom of Form.

This study examines the invalidity and legal consequences of unilateral revocation of a letter of agreement. A letter of agreement is a form of agreement that ends and prevents disputes as regulated in Article 1851 of the Civil Code, with the invalidity clause referring to Article 1320 of the Civil Code. The unilateral revocation of a letter of agreement can cause legal problems, especially if it is not based on the wrong reasons such as the will of the will (falsification, fraud, or error) or an unlawful cause. Based on the results of the study, the revocation of the letter in the case of Guru Supriyalni is weak in terms of law because there is no evidence to support the claim. In fact, the letter in Mali is still considered wrong in binding the parties. This study also highlights the importance of the basis of legal certainty in the transaction, in which unilateral revocation without legal basis violates this principle and can result in consequences in the form of non-performance and claims for damages. This study recommends approaching dispute resolution through alternative legal channels in order to prevent injustice and legal certainty between the parties.